Quotes & Highlights

let me point out one more subtle implication of this approach towards buying information. It implies that there is an economically optimum sequence for risk-reduction activities. Low-cost activities that remove a lot of risk should occur before high-cost activities that remove very little risk.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
When DIP is high, cycle times are long. When cycle times are long, innovation occurs so late that it becomes imitation.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
Few developers realize that queues are the single most important cause of poor product development performance. Queues cause our development process to have too much design-in-process inventory (DIP). Developers are unaware of DIP, they do not measure it, and they do not manage it. They do not even realize that DIP is a problem.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
Any subprocess within product development can be viewed in economic terms. The total cost of the subprocess is composed of its cost of capacity and the delay cost associated with its cycle time.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
There are two important reasons why product developers are blind to DIP. First, inventory is financially invisible in product development. We do not carry partially completed designs as assets on our balance sheet; we expense R&D costs as they are incurred. If we ask the chief financial officer how much inventory we have in product development, the answer will be, “Zero.” Second, we are blind to product development inventory because it is usually physically invisible. DIP is information, not physical objects. We do not see piles of DIP when we walk through the engineering department. In product development, our inventory is bits on a disk drive, and we have very big disk drives in product development.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
Since high capacity utilization simultaneously raises efficiency and increases delay cost, we need to look at the combined impact of these two factors. We can only do so if we express both factors in the same unit of measure, life-cycle profits. If we do this, we will always conclude that operating a product development process near full utilization is an economic disaster.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
This leads them to load their processes to dangerously high levels of utilization. How high? Executives coming to my product development classes report operating at 98.5 percent utilization in the precourse surveys. What will this do? Chapter 3 will explain why large queues form when processes with variability are operated at high levels of capacity utilization. In reality, the misguided pursuit of efficiency creates enormous costs in the unmeasured, invisible portion of the product development process, its queues.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
Minimizing the economic impact of variability is a profoundly different goal than minimizing variability.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
variability is only a proxy variable. We are actually interested in influencing the economic cost of this variability.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow
To manage product development effectively, we must recognize that valuable new information is constantly arriving throughout the development cycle. Rather than remaining frozen in time, locked to our original plan, we must learn to make good economic choices using this emerging information.
— Donald G Reinertsen, The Principles of Product Development Flow