<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Copyrighting Garage Door Openers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.silverspider.com/2004/no-copyrighting-garage-door-openers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.silverspider.com/2004/no-copyrighting-garage-door-openers/</link>
	<description>The Web site of Alex S. Jones, community catalyst, user advocate, Web technologist, barbecue acolyte &#38; information junkie</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: garage door opener</title>
		<link>http://www.silverspider.com/2004/no-copyrighting-garage-door-openers/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>garage door opener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2004 23:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=361#comment-125</guid>
		<description>There is a copy of the Chamberlain VS. Skylink case at &lt;em&gt;[Removed by Alex]&lt;/em&gt; they have it in PDF and in text format for anyone who is interested in reading the judge's decision about the garage door opener case. There is other garage door opener information there as well pertaining to FAQ's and the like.

&lt;strong&gt;Editor's Note:&lt;/strong&gt; I have removed the URL as the aforementioned copy of the ruling was not clearly marked, nor easy to find. As there is little information on the site, beyond the standard product text for each garage door opener, I do not see it as a useful resource related to this case. In addition, I am not currently accepting advertising on this site, and I am certainly not providing free advertising for retail sites.

If you feel this is unfair, send me an e-mail from the address included with the original comment, and we can talk about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a copy of the Chamberlain VS. Skylink case at <em>[Removed by Alex]</em> they have it in PDF and in text format for anyone who is interested in reading the judge&#8217;s decision about the garage door opener case. There is other garage door opener information there as well pertaining to FAQ&#8217;s and the like.</p>
<p><strong>Editor&#8217;s Note:</strong> I have removed the URL as the aforementioned copy of the ruling was not clearly marked, nor easy to find. As there is little information on the site, beyond the standard product text for each garage door opener, I do not see it as a useful resource related to this case. In addition, I am not currently accepting advertising on this site, and I am certainly not providing free advertising for retail sites.</p>
<p>If you feel this is unfair, send me an e-mail from the address included with the original comment, and we can talk about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
